Click here to close
New Message Alert
"A Revolution Within a Constitutional Crisis"


"A Revolution Within a Constitutional Crisis"  

  Click Here to have an E-mail Sent to you when a new message is added to this thread
Author: TheCrow   Date: 6/17/2022 11:01:17 AM  +3/-0  

Imagine America had the January 6 mob interrupted the congressional certification of the 2020 vote.

Once cowed into inaction, the mob would be encouraged to further action to interrupt the congress.

Who, what would be 'pure enough' to satisfy a violent mob? You don't have to have a very vivid inagination, several violent mobs have creasted chaos, anarchtic situations that they used to allow an active minority control through violence. The French Revolution springs to mind immediately, but there is an even more pertinent and recent example of a violent revolution to continue purity of political principle- Russia, Communist China.

Trump[ was the Chairman Mao to January 6ers. 

 

"A Revolution Within a Constitutional Crisis"

Imagine if we were learning all this for the first time

 
Mike Pence looking at a Trump tweet on January 6, 2021. (Via January 6 Committee)

 

“That declaration of Donald Trump as the next president would have plunged America into what I believe would’ve been tantamount to a revolution within a constitutional crisis in America, which in my view, and I am only one man, would’ve been the first constitutional crisis since the founding of the Republic.” — Judge Michael Luttig

Take a moment consider this. This is not the hair-on-fire, over-wrought, frantic hyperbole of Resistance Twitter.

The warning about “a revolution within a constitutional crisis,” didn’t come from Rachel Maddow, the guys who run Pod Save America, the NYT’s editorial page, or the usual prophets of Armageddon.

This was Michael Luttig, a conservative’s conservative; a former federal appeals court judge, who was on George Bush’s short-list for the Supreme Court.

Unfortunately, because we are all doomed to spend eternity in middle school, much of the buzz yesterday focused on how slowly Luttig spoke. But, my colleague Will Saletan provided a sober counterpoint:

“Every word…”

**

Try this mental exercise: Imagine that we were learning all of this now for the first time.

Here is Liz Cheney:

On the morning of January 6, President Donald Trump’s intention was to remain President of the United States despite the lawful outcome of the 2020 election and in violation of his constitutional obligation to relinquish power. Over multiple months, Donald Trump oversaw and coordinated a sophisticated plan to overturn the presidential election and prevent the transfer of presidential power.

What if…

Instead of having the story come out in dribs and drabs and disconnected details over the last year and half, imagine that this was fresh — and that it was bursting onto the front pages just now:

The depth and scope of the president’s attempts to overturn the election; the bat-shit crazy conspiracy theories; the threats and violence used to intimidate Congress and the vice president; the plot involving fake electors; the danger of extremist groups like the Oath Keepers who mobilized to keep the president in power; the plot to use the electoral count to erase the results of the 2020 election and keep the president in power.

Try to imagine if we were just now hearing secret tapes for the first time exposing the campaign to pressure state elections officials to “find” votes, and state legislators to overturn the popular vote, while the wife of a Supreme Court justice pressured state legislators and others to reject the peaceful transfer of power.

Imagine: What if we were just now seeing videos of the president’s own aides telling him that he was detached from reality; and that his plot was illegal and unconstitutional. What if we just now realized that the Commander in Chief thought about using the military to seize voting machines, and came within inches of subverting the Department of Justice to push fraudulent election claims.

And try to imagine if we were just learning that all of this was launched by a drunken demagogue on election night and a president who surrounded himself with demented loons, grifters, and seditionists.

What if we just now were learning of the criminal conspiracy by a president who had sworn to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." What if the testimony of his closest aides made it clear that the man in the Oval Office was either lying or delusional in his desperate bid to hang onto power?

And bear with me for a moment here:

What if we woke up this morning to the news that he had “specifically targeted his vice president with tweeted words of condemnation,” and turned a violent mob against him. What if we were just learning that confidential informants had told the feds that Trump-supporting members of the Proud Boys “would have killed” Pence during the Insurrection “if given a chance.”

And what if we were just learning today that when the mob began chanting “Hang Mike Pence,” the president said that he “deserved it.”

**

Three thoughts:

(1) If we had learned all of this at once, it would have been — and this is not hyperbole— a political cataclysm, beyond the powers of even most determined turd-polishers to ignore. There would not be the slightest doubt about the gravity of the crisis or the desperate need for accountability.

(2) Millions of Americans are, in fact, learning all of this for the first time.

(3) I have no idea whether this will make a difference.

**


 
    Return-To-Index   Display Full Msg Thread  FLAG This Message

"A Revolution Within a Constitutional Crisis" +3/-0 TheCrow 6/17/2022 11:01:17 AM