"I never, ever said that Paul/Saul of Tarsus was not a person. I said that there is no proof of his existence."
Nonsense. I haven't got time for your semantics, Crowbot. A person needs to EXIST before he can be a person. You wanted to desparage Pauls conversion and his message. Therefore you qustioned his EXISTENCE.
You twist the logic into the most favorable fashion. I'll repeat "that there is no proof of his existence."
perhaps you should say what sort of Evidence you would accept? be sure it applies to all ancient figures .. in other words apply the same standar. (sic)
And I don't need to apply the same standard to any and all historical figures as we're not discussing them, are we?
|